Uh huh. "I was there!" She "was there" at ground zero too apparently.
People who are voting for the she-bitch just because she is (in theory) lacking male genitalia are clearly sexist lunatics who put whether or not someone has a penis as more important than whether or not they are a blatant liar. I guess they cut her some slack because she must have picked up the habit from that no-good husband of hers.
Dems: its starting to look like your choice is between a lying, inexperienced psychopathic demon and a well-spoken yet politically inexperienced race-baiting messiah.
What gets me is these fetid sacks of estrogenated angst claiming that it's absolutely sexist to NOT vote for Cankles because she's a woman, but it's certainly NOT sexist to vote for her only because she (theoretically) has a vajayjay.
For some reason this didn't post before. It might be that he got the captcha wrong. Regardless, I just want to make it clear that I am not censoring anyone.
From: LEO On the other hand,the Repugs are fielding a corpse.
Go ahead and vote Nader. A vote for him will end up being a vote for McCain (not that he needs any more help from the Dems than he's already getting.)
Sure, McCain is old and corpse-looking, but considering that young people don't vote and old people do, that really shouldn't be much of a problem for him. Regardless, I'm still keeping a close eye on his VP pick.
Notice: There are some areas of this website where everyone is permitted to post information.
(In this case, information is defined as anything you can paste/type into an html form.)
Do not post anything that cannot be legally put in the public domain.
I have the absolute power to remove/modify/edit anything that is posted on this site.
All original content on this website is owned solely by me, and cannot be redistributed without prior written consent.
All information on this website is provided with absolutely no warranty. [Privacy Policy]
Click Here for information about a FREE introduction to firearms safety and shooting.
